🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner gained half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. So there existed some opposition. But no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.